Menu
Nov 26, 2018 - Name tracing worksheets pdf slender man cinemark summary writing prompts. Interesting theology topics structure of research proposal pdf global warming. In the book thief what is literature review pdf contoh penghargaan tesis pdf. Template excel student book binding child development observation.
Your application will be able to recognize PDF documents with tables even with invisible borders and create from them an Excel spreadsheet. Have a Question? You have a question, need a support or a code example: ask our support team at. We will help you quickly and with pleasure. What PDF Focus.Net gives me:. Save time and cost of the product development.
The writing of own PDF converter in C# requires a lot of days of hard work and takes approx 100 000 C# code lines. PDF Focus.Net will save a lot of my time and I'll need only to add the reference to 'SautinSoft.PdfFocus.dll' and write 3-4 C# code lines. The one product provides me by set of API to convert PDF at various formats at once: Word, DOCX, RTF, Excel, HTML, Text, Multipage TIFF, Jpeg, PNG. Because of this is absolutely standalone PDF library, my clients don't need to have Adobe Acrobat, MS Word, Excel or other software. My software will have the one of the fastest API to convert PDFs inside, you may.
I can select the any of product editions:,. This saves my money. Let's us say, that I'm looking for only the API to convert PDF to HTML and don't need other features. Given this point, I can purchase the ' edtion of PDF Focus.Net. It's much cheaper than competitor's price.
The one time price. I pay a one time and can use «PDF Focus.Net» for a whole life without any additional fees. My license will never expires.
As bonus, I get unlimited technical support during a whole life for free and independently of the date of my purchasing. In these screenshots you can see input PDF document and output XLS with extracted table.
The present study is about empowering EFL students in writing through portfolios-based instruction. In this study, portfolios were conceptualized as an approach to teaching writing. They were defined as a selected collection of students’ works that exhibited their efforts, progress, and achievements in an English writing class in one semester. Meanwhile, the term ‘empowerment’ was understood as the improvement in writing involving two aspects: lingual and personal empowerment.
Lingual empowerment was the improvement of writing where students could produce an effective or proficient text, whereas personal empowerment was concerned with the improvement of writing in which students showed a positive attitude in developing the text and towards their writing performance. The present study was conducted in an English writing class at the tertiary level including fifteen student teachers as the participants. The study took place in one semester, and it employed an action research design. Data were gained from student text analyses, classroom observations, the use of questionnaire, and interview. Data were analyzed using a qualitative and quantitative strategy. The qualitative strategy was undertaken through text analyses and coding in data of student texts, classroom observations, and interview. On the other hand, the quantitative strategy was based on descriptive statistics with frequency counts to data of questionnaire.
The findings revealed that, despite several limitations, portfolio-based instruction could empower EFL students in writing in both lingual and personal aspects. Regarding lingual aspect, students improved their writing in terms of idea development or organization, fluency or structure, word choice, and mechanics.